| |
Contract Number: 4600001799 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract Approval Date: March 28, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract Start Date: June 15, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract End Date: June 30, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Period: May 1 thru May 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM TASK DESCRIPTIONS |
Planned Complete |
Actual Complete |
Percent Complete |
|
Comments |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 1: Administration and Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 1a: Identify and appoint Coalition Coordinator |
Oct, 2001 |
Oct, 2001 |
100% |
|
Coordinator, Steve Haze started 10/1 under BOR funds |
|
|
Task 1b: Create a comprehensive mailing list of landowners
and other stakeholders in the watershed. |
April, 2002 |
Apr, 2002 |
100% |
|
List of 2500 landowners, 55 Stakeholder, local Government
groups and 5 newspapers |
|
|
Task 1c: Contact stakeholders by mail and in person to
encourage participation |
May,2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Notice to Property owners sent out via USPS on 5/6,
Packages sent to Chairs of Fresno & Madera County Board of
Supervisors, (55) Stakeholder interests received package via email
distribution |
|
|
Task 1d: Prepare and send press releases concerning the
formation of the MAWC to media outlets |
May, 2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Press Release Packages Sent to (8) reporters representing
(5) newspapers - 5/6 |
|
|
Task 1e: Convene formative meeting |
May, 2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Formative meeting conducted in Friant on 5/23/02 (2.5)
hrs. 80 participants w/ approx. 50% property owners in proposed watershed
study area |
|
|
Task 1f: Form Steering Committee, sub-committees |
June, 2002 |
|
10% |
|
Visioning Workshop scheduled for 6/15/02 in Friant (3
hrs.) |
|
|
Task 1g: Convene a minimum of 16 Steering Committee
meetings |
May, 2003 |
|
0% |
|
1st Steering Committee scheduled for 6/27/02 (2) hrs.
Approximately, 80 individuals are candidates to participate on Steering
and subcommittees |
| |
Task 1h: Convene a minimum of 8 Coalition meetings |
June, 2003 |
|
12.5% |
|
1st Coalition meeting scheduled for 5/23/02 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task will include: a comprehensive
mailing list, press releases, agendas and minutes from 24 meetings, as
well as a fully formed Steering Committee and Coalition |
|
|
|
|
Task Products - Comprehensive Mailing list in excess of
2,500 developed. (12) volunteers @ (2) hrs. ea. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success will be measured by completion of each project
task according to the timetable, the reporting of coalition activities in
local newspapers, having a quorum present at all Steering Committee
Meetings, having a minimum of 40 stakeholders participate in Coalition
meetings and having those participants represent at least six different
categories of stakeholders (e.g. rancher, homeowner, federal agency,
sportsmen, policy maker, scientist, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria exceeded for 1st meeting - 80
Stakeholders representing 12 categories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 2: Training and Outreach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 2a: Conduct a total of 4 community education sessions
on topics related to watershed protection, restoration, management, and
monitoring |
June, 2003 |
|
10% |
|
Visioning Workshop scheduled for Saturday, June 15 -
Facilitator assigned and outline of activities drafted. Next prep mtg 6/10 |
|
|
Task 2b: Make a total of 8 informational mailings to all
stakeholders including meeting schedules, agendas, minutes, report
summaries, public policy issues and other information of interest
regarding watersheds |
June, 2003 |
|
15% |
|
1st Informational mailing for Stakeholders (property
owners sent out USPS). Other stakeholders via email distribution.
Informational Package to County Board of Supervisors sent 5/6,
Presentation to Fresno Co. Water Advisory Committee conducted 5/16 |
|
|
Task 2c: Share information regarding the activities of the
Millerton Area Watershed Coalition with the general public through press
releases and community presentations |
June, 2003 |
|
10% |
|
1st Press Release Package Sent out 5/6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task include: training materials,
coalition mailing packets, and press releases. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success will be measured by attendance of at least 40
people at training sessions, their feedback, and completed evaluation
forms; more informed participation in coalition meetings; and increased
interest in citizen monitoring activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 3: Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3a: Identification of major stressors and threats to
the Millerton Area Watershed with input from a wide range of stakeholders. |
June, 2002 |
|
|
|
As part of visioning workshop - June 15 |
|
|
Task 3b: Gather and review current and historical data on
the watershed processes to establish, as much as possible, a baseline |
July, 2002 |
|
5% |
|
Listing of historic, current and planned assessments
established |
| |
Task 3c: Evaluate current conditions and use patterns |
Sept, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3d: Working with partners, collect additional data
especially where there are significant gaps in the database. |
Jan, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3e: Prepare a written assessment report to be
circulated and shared by all interested parties |
April, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task will include: lists and
inventories of watershed conditions, summaries of research reviewed or
tests conducted, and a written assessment report. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the
completion of the assessment report by the target date, the participation
in the assessment by stakeholders from at least 8 different stakeholder
categories, and the ability to fill in as many data gaps as possible. |
|
|
|
|
Application submitted 6/5 to CALFED for Finegold upper
watershed planning grant for North Fork Community |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 4: Collaboration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 4a: Compile a list of potential collaborators among
watershed groups and other agencies and organizations |
April, 2002 |
April, 2002 |
100% |
|
Listing of potential collaborators established. Two
Pre-program planning sessions held with agency groups |
|
|
Task 4b: Maintain frequent contact with other watershed
groups for the purpose of sharing ideas, strategies and data. |
June, 2003 |
|
7% |
|
On-going participation with Central Sierra Watershed
Committee and Water Advisory Committees for Madera & Fresno Counties.
Attendence at Coarsegold and Sierra RCD's. Participation as Stakeholder
for Friant Storage Investigation program under USBR/DWR (CALFED) |
|
|
Task 4c: Maintain frequent contact with local, regional
and national organizations with an interest in conservation or watershed
protection and restoration. |
June, 2003 |
|
7% |
|
On-going attendance at monthly CALFED Watershed Advisory
Committee meetings - Cache Creek Watershed field trip - 5/17. Scholarship
obtained for Working at a watershed level workshop - 6/3-6/7 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will produce ready reference files with technical
reports, guides and documents produced by these groups that will assist
the MAWC to complete their assessment activities and learn about
successful watershed management programs. It will also produce
correspondence and other evidence that the MAWC has shared its data and
other information with these organizations. |
|
|
|
|
Website established as repository for technical
publications and reports. Hyperlinks to key watershed agencies and
resources. Resource Documents being collected |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the number
of collaborators involved (10 or more) and the frequency and duration of
contact. |
|
|
|
|
Current Collaborators(as of 5/31): Sierra RCD, Coarsegold
RCD, Central Sierra Watershed Committee, North Fork Community Development
Council, Yosemite-Sequoia RC&D Council, Fresno Co. Water Advisory
Committee, Madera Co Water Oversight Committee, California Rangeland Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 5: Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 5a: Develop and implement a funding plan for the
continuation of the coalition. |
May, 2003 |
|
|
|
Initiated efforts to secure funding under Prop 40.
Discussions with State Senate Agriculture and Water Committee (Senator
Costa, Fresno) |
|
|
Task 5b: Develop a funding and implementation plan for the
creation of a comprehensive watershed management plan. |
June, 2003 |
|
|
|
Collaboration with Watershed Economic and Resource
entities regarding application for Prop 13 funding for Upper Finegold
Watershed Assessment. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This task will produce commitments from local agencies
and organizations for the funds required to continue the operation of the
Millerton Area Watershed Coalition. It will also produce at least 3
potential sources for the funds necessary to create a watershed management
plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by whether or
not the community mobilizes the resources necessary to maintain the
coalition. It will also be measured by the number of grantors that show
some interest in funding the management plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 6: Reporting and Presentations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6a: Prepare comprehensive quarterly progress reports
on all aspects of project implementation |
April, 2003 |
|
16% |
|
1st report due end of June, 2002 |
|
|
Task 6b: Prepare a draft final report that summarizes all
project activities and accomplishments over the two year period. Send a
draft copy to CALFED for comments and observations. |
May, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6c: Revise draft final report to include comments
from CALFED and submit |
June, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6d: Deliver final summary presentation(s) to CALFED
as requested. |
June, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This task will produce 8 quarterly reports, a final
report, and presentation materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the
accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the reports and presentations.
All should provide a good reflection of all project activities,
accomplishments and problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|